Sentences written about this title, gathered by type from the Japanese and English Wikipedia articles (as of 2026-8-30).
The computer versions were mostly praised for their graphics and realism, including the ball movements and wind conditions.
The sound was mostly praised across various platforms, as was the variety of options.
The camera and various perspectives were also praised.
However, she criticized the lack of female golfers, the bland graphics, the minimal sounds, and the inclusion of "one of the worst loading tunes I've ever heard.
Amiga User International praised the replay modes and considered the game superior to Leader Board, but criticized Hubbard's musical score as a "grating series of fanfares".
ACE praised the game and stated that it would appeal to experienced and inexperienced golf players.
Raze reviewed the Amiga and Genesis versions; their presentation was praised, but the Genesis version was considered superior for being easier.
Mean Machines praised the Genesis version, including its multiplayer option.
VideoGames & Computer Entertainment praised the realism of the Genesis version and considered it an impressive conversion of the computer version, while calling it a "thoroughly entertaining, challenging and complex golf simulation.
However, the magazine criticized the graphics, considering them inferior to Arnold Palmer Tournament Golf.
AllGame's Jonathan Sutyak praised the Genesis version for its realism, but felt that the graphics could be better.
Reviewers for Electronic Gaming Monthly praised the sounds of the Genesis version but had varying opinions about the graphics;
Jonathan Davies, writing for the U.K. magazine Super Play, criticized the SNES version for its "horrible" colors, jerky camera scrolling, and unrealistic ball movements, but stated that it played as well as the computer versions and was enjoyable.
The magazine criticized the bland graphics and minimal backgrounds, but praised the fast and smooth animation of the ball while it is in flight to the hole.
Mean Machines praised the Master System version, considering it the console's best golf game.
The magazine stated that it played as good as other versions of the game, and considered it superior to the SNES version, although slow screen reanimation was criticized.
The magazine criticized the minimal sounds and music, and stated that the courses looked too similar to each other.
Game Players stated that the Game Gear version had relatively good graphics but poor gameplay, criticizing unpredictable and inaccurate shooting distances.
Stephen Bradley of Amiga Format praised the additional courses, and stated that while the graphics were not comparable to Nick Faldo's Championship Golf or the Links series, the game was still easy to play.
Amiga Power praised the gameplay options.
Amiga Computing also praised its easy gameplay.
Amiga Action stated that PGA Tour Golf stood out from other golfing games with its various features, while concluding that it could appeal to non golf fans.
The One, reviewing the DOS version in 1990, stated that the game had a perfect balance of realism and simplistic gameplay.
Sandra Foley of Amiga Computing stated that Electronic Arts "managed to come closer than any other to simulating actual golf.
Amiga User International praised the replay modes and considered the game superior to Leader Board, but criticized Hubbard's musical score as a "grating series of fanfares".
ACE praised the game and stated that it would appeal to experienced and inexperienced golf players.
The magazine concluded that it was superior to Arnold Palmer Tournament Golf, and stated that it would appeal to golfers as well as people who normally would not purchase golf games.
Jonathan Davies, writing for the U.K. magazine Super Play, criticized the SNES version for its "horrible" colors, jerky camera scrolling, and unrealistic ball movements, but stated that it played as well as the computer versions and was enjoyable.
N-Force considered the swing animation in the SNES version to be somewhat jerky, and stated that the swing control method was inconsistent and frustrating.
The magazine stated that it played as good as other versions of the game, and considered it superior to the SNES version, although slow screen reanimation was criticized.
GamePro stated that the Game Gear version mostly fulfilled its goal to provide good golfing on the console, but considered it an average game.
The magazine criticized the minimal sounds and music, and stated that the courses looked too similar to each other.
Game Players stated that the Game Gear version had relatively good graphics but poor gameplay, criticizing unpredictable and inaccurate shooting distances.
The magazine stated that the Game Gear version was not as good as the Genesis version.
The One called the 1994 version a "superb" re-release that was "well overdue," and attributed the game's initial success to it being a "true" golf simulator.
Stephen Bradley of Amiga Format praised the additional courses, and stated that while the graphics were not comparable to Nick Faldo's Championship Golf or the Links series, the game was still easy to play.
Tony Dillon of CU Amiga stated that the game revolutionized computer golf upon its initial release, and that "while many of its contemporaries are far more sophisticated and even more playable, none have ever been as original.
However, the magazine stated that the game had not aged well, and called its control method "clumsy and uncomfortable.
In 1996, Steve McGill of Amiga Format wrote that despite the dated graphics, PGA Tour Golf still had "timeless appeal".
In 1997, Martin Davies of CU Amiga called the game an "essential buy for all golf and sports fans," praising the variety, easy gameplay, and lasting appeal.
The One reviewed the Amiga version of PGA Tour Golf in 1991, giving it an overall score of 92%.
Mega, in its October 1992 issue, placed PGA Tour Golf at number 10 on its list of Top Mega Drive Games of All Time.
The passages quoted on this page are taken verbatim from the Japanese and English Wikipedia articles.Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) — reusable under those terms. They are the work of the people who wrote them.