chihiroryTo the list
Famicom AnalysisShanghaiShanghai — stories left
Stories left

Shanghai — stories left

Sentences written about this title, gathered by type from the Japanese and English Wikipedia articles (as of 2026-8-30).

Numbers (3)

In the "Cross Review" feature of the magazine Famitsu, the Family Computer version scored a high total of 28 out of 40, while the Game Boy version was given an ordinary rating with a total of 23 out of 40.

Shanghai sold more than 500,000 copies by 1991.

(English)English Wikipedia"Shanghai"from "Reception"

Computer and Video Games magazine reviewed the game in their March 1991 issue giving an 84% score.

(English)English Wikipedia"Shanghai"from "Atari Lynx"

Disputes (3)

In Japan, Game Machine listed Sunsoft's version of Shanghai on their May 1, 1988, issue as being the fourth most-successful table arcade unit of the month; it ended the year as Japan's ninth highest-grossing arcade conversion kit of 1988.

(English)English Wikipedia"Shanghai"from "Reception"

Dragon magazine gave the Atari Lynx version 5 stars in their May 1992 issue.

(English)English Wikipedia"Shanghai"from "Atari Lynx"

Computer and Video Games magazine reviewed the game in their March 1991 issue giving an 84% score.

(English)English Wikipedia"Shanghai"from "Atari Lynx"

People (3)

Gregg Williams stated, "I couldn't believe [Activision] had wasted their resources on putting it out", while Charles Ardai called it "probably the best game of the year".

(English)English Wikipedia"Shanghai"from "Critical reviews"

Roy Wagner reviewed the game for Computer Gaming World, and stated that "on the C64, the patterns and stacks are hard to discern (soon your eyes match the screen).

(English)English Wikipedia"Shanghai"from "Critical reviews"

Compute! reviewed the game favorably, reporting that "our Shanghai mania is of such proportions that I am beginning to fear for our health".

(English)English Wikipedia"Shanghai"from "Critical reviews"

The passages quoted on this page are taken verbatim from the Japanese and English Wikipedia articles.Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) — reusable under those terms. They are the work of the people who wrote them.

Source: created by adapting the "Media Arts Database" (https://mediaarts-db.artmuseums.go.jp/) of the National Center for Art Research, National Museum of Art
Sources: Japanese and English Wikipedia, Wikidata
Sources: TASVideos (https://tasvideos.org/), speedrun.com (https://www.speedrun.com/)